The Challenge
Some parts of this page/site are currently incomplete & will be updated asap
Other parts will change continually so use “Refresh” in your browser !!
There is extensive use of “Tooltips” text to support learning which do not seem to render on a Smartphone
Learning -> Resources Available, All Work is Subject to DHRF's "GD"
What is the purpose of “The Challenge”?
One kind of challenge
The more astute may see where these pages are leading to… !!
Another kind of challenge
It is extremely important to develop Independent Thinking & Critical Analysis skills
Put them together, and you have: Critical Thinking
“Critical thinking is the analysis of facts to form a judgment. The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking. It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities as well as a commitment to overcome native egocentrism and sociocentrism”
Does it draw a clear distinction between ‘fact’ & ‘opinion’?
What is ‘fact’?
What is ‘opinion’?
Does it comply with the ‘Scientific Method’ (partly or fully)?
Does it contain ‘Pseudoscience’ (partly or fully)?
Does it contain ‘Agendas’ (personal or otherwise)?
Does it contain ‘truth’ (is it correct - partly or fully)?
Does it contain ‘falsehoods’ (is it incorrect - partly or fully)?
Has the ‘core material’ been ‘re-packaged’ or ‘encapsulated’?
Out-of-context?
Agendas?
Does it contain ‘ad hominem’?
“Ad hominem (Latin for ‘to the person’), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments, some but not all of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is “A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong”“
Index of Challenges
In view of DHRF’s commitment to support learning, there is a much higher “learning content” in the Research Work Streams & elsewhere than would otherwise be the case… Please be aware of that ↩